Redanian Intelligence shares fresh news about the second season "Witcher" – The creators of the show chose the performer of the role of Mavi. According to the resource, the queen of Liria and Rivia will portray a Scottish actress Rebecca Hanssen (Rebecca Hanssen).
Heroine Hanssen will appear in the series, for the production of which they are responsible Sarah O’Gorman (Sarah o’Gorman) and Edward Bazalgett (Edward Bazalgette). These directors take off the third and fourth, as well as the fifth and eighth episodes, respectively. However, it is not a fact that Mave appears in all four episodes.
Previously you could see Hanssen In the show "Traditions" from Amazon And the film "Enola Holmes" from Netflix. In addition, the actress plays a bard-plling alfir in Baldur’s Gate III.
Recall in the saga Andrzej Sapkovsky (Andrzej sapkowski) Maiva is relatively rare. And here CD Projekt Red dedicated a whole game to the ruler – Maeva became the main character of the card RPG “Blood enmity: Witcher. Stories ".
The second season The Witcher should start in 2021.
Bonus Trek-recent photographs from the shootings that are captured Henry Cavill (Henry Cavill), aka Geralt, riding on the new roach.
November 27, 2020, about 300 players can sue the allegedly illegal use of their appearance in FIFA
November 27, 2020, the coming DLC for Iron Harvest will talk about the revolution in alternative Russia
The best comments
This child, for a second, is 26 years old
NETFLIX, as usual, "pleases" with a custom.
For the role of a boy-woman in the armor of the Scandinavian physique and the royal statue, consider the red Sonya from the work of the same name … we selected and selected, and picked up the girl-girl on which it would be possible to look sane from foil .____________.
Well, like … Kamon. I am not a sexist, but this contradicts common sense as stubbornly as it can.
You had a kalanta, and she was very quite quite for her own prototype … which means that a certain vision was still! (IMHO it was controversial, that to Triss and Fringilla (and Dryad), but it was) why then, so much like a rake, then jump v_v
In general, I look at all this as a calanta on Nilfgard … (I attached the picture) – it remains only to hope that the series will be as surprised as, forgive me for inappropriate humor, Nilfgard surprised the calance. : |
(Faith, however, less and less)
Instead of a powerful, hard queen, they took a snot. Norms (no).
1st season, the bottom broke the bottom https://slotsshine.uk/login/ completely. Before the series, was dissatisfied with the choice of Henry Cavill for the role of Geralt. But after watching the 1st season, I realized that Henry Cavill is the best that is in this heap of “substance”. For all the steel is just terrible. The whole series is a spit in the face of fans, both books and games in the universe. Apparently the 2nd season decided to drill even deeper the bottom.
Comrade Major, take a closer look at the little man
It’s good that at least the actress and not the actor
If in flashbacks, then well, as it could be, with high -quality makeup. But if according to chronology, which is the queen of it, why laugh.
So she was described in books as beautiful and young.
26 by the standards of the Middle Ages, this is already quite an adult.
So Cast is not as all up as they are being injured.
Officially, the age is not indicated anywhere, but its approximate value can be calculated. So the battle for the ill -fated bridge takes place in 1267, by that time the queen already has two sons. She gave birth to a first -born at the age of 20 and by the time he described in the book he was already going to knightly tournaments, t.e. he is already about 20 years old. So somewhere in the area of 1247, Maeva celebrated her second anniversary (1267-20 = 1247), and it was born around 1227 (1247-20 = 1227). When making discounts on all kinds of ± errors we get a queen in the region of 35 years (perhaps even older). In total, the age difference between the actress (which is 26 years old) and the character of which she will play at least 9 years + (I repeat) the transfer of two genera + what no combat experience (of course, a wildly subjective nit -picking that can be corrected by makeup, but so far the actress does not stand on a person with the title “White Queen of Liria and Rivia, the commander in chief and the Supreme Commander -in -Chief and the Supreme Commander -in -Chief and the Supreme Commander -in -Chief and the Supreme Commander -in -Chief and the Supreme Commander Rivia ". And let’s be honest who we are trying to deceive, just with makeup and costumes, this project is very sad and they obviously will not save the situation).
Not well, in books it is described as very beautiful and young .
Yes, after the battle, she loses a couple of teeth there and got a scar.
But she was not a 2 -meter barn of a masculine.
So not everything is so bad if the makeup and hair is painted in a gray.
And in general in her books she has an episodic role.
At the time of the battle for the bridge on Yarug, the Queen was about 35 years old and she had two sons. So at least according to these parameters there is already a mistake with the actress.
You decided to scare me? If so, then you did
New release "Scary, cut down"?)
*There should be a quote about less evil*
Someone aware of what kind of miracle the sword of Cavill? Everyday interest.
As I understand it, this is either a training sword in front of a double, or shortened (for which? so as not to poke someone inadvertently?) and after it will be finished on the computer. Correct if you know.
Interesting, and her teeth in the series will knock out?
Mother of two children
Mother of two adult children and a widow
It is amazing that Netflix took such a step, t.To. There is a reason to blame them for Aijism: here you could take a woman 5-7 years older calmly.
From the very beginning they said that they were doing books, and not by games.
I know, but I don’t understand why it is specially to do, not as in the game, if this does not contradict the book.
So no, they do not make games.
Most fans of the Witcher series played games about the Witcher and were delighted.
The book tells about this. How do you think this is shown on the screen so that the viewer understands that he does not wave to the beat of the steps, and does it on purpose? To let the orders of voice?
You can just show it what difference the viewer will understand or not, those who read will understand. You saw this fight at all? Two drunks were clouched, the professionalism of Geralt was not disclosed in anything, I did not see anything special that distinguished him from the Witcher, who died before that because. And of course, when the sniffing herall on the shoulder blades instead of baking her face, she sniffed him, dripped with saliva, then lifted and hit the wall.
This is undoubtedly very important. The basis of the foundations of books about the Witcher. These fanatics for the most part have a series (although he has real jambs), who do not like any deviations from the literal repetition of books.
This series is bad even from the point of view of a person who is not familiar with the Witcher. Firstly, the budget is striking directly, constantly in the frame there are no more groups of people, in the dining room of the king of the foil, it feels like it is happening in my dacha. Then a tangled narrative, it is not clear the viewer that a branch about Ian in another time passes.
They talk about it with such pride … Mavi had several pages in the book. And all.
Showranner – dumb fool. And the scriptwriters are greedy goats.
Wait, or there will still be) … Now the actors may look like actresses. I’m not talking about this case, but in principle.